Showing posts with label Kevin Spacey. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kevin Spacey. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Kevin Spacey’s Beyond the Sea (2004)


Your Humble Commentator found himself, in the mid-1980s, at a party in Dinkytown, arguing with some guy about who was the greatest actor in Hollywood: Dustin Hoffman (The Graduate, Midnight Cowboy, Tootsie, Rainman) or Robert De Niro (The Godfather Part II, Taxi Driver, Raging Bull, King of Comedy). Today, we think we’re blessed with an even wider array of choices – Kevin Spacey (whose film Beyond the Sea we’re screening tonight), Daniel Day-Lewis, Johnny Depp, Sean Penn, and Don Cheadle all come to mind. In fact, we selected American Beauty, The Usual Suspects, and Beyond the Sea for inclusion in this year’s film series because of what Spacey in particular had made of them.

But is he the greatest? First, this begs the question of the criteria one uses to determine such irrelevancies. Allow us to suggest the following (and we’ll limit ourselves to male actors this time):

Losing oneself in a character – One of the most impressive aspects of watching a great actor is the amazement at seeing him or her completely morph from one role to the next, a “how’d he do that” moment. In 1985, for example, Daniel Day-Lewis made two movies, Stephen Frears' My Beautiful Laundrette and James Ivory's Room With a View. In one he played a gay punk London tough, in the other a pretentious uptight Edwardian aristocrat. And you could not tell it was the same actor. Wow.

Consistent greatness over time – this is hard. A lot of actors start well and then flame out or coast on their success (one might put Dustin Hoffman in this category). Others start out as two-dimensional and don’t mature into richer, more nuanced characters until later (Bill Murray comes to mind). Consistent greatness is a true achievement. Here Sean Penn is a great example, from his breakout role in Amy Heckerling's Fast Times at Ridgemont High (1982) to the complex characterization in Tim Robbins' Dead Man Walking (1995) to his most recent tour de force in the biopic Gus Van Sant's Milk (2008). There may be occasional duds, but he’s still got it.

Not falling into type – This is a killer if you’re going to be considered great – you can’t be the same person every time (Tom Cruise, we’re looking at you). You can’t make every character into you; you have to make yourself into the character. And you have to take risks with your audience’s and fans’ expectations. Is there a more experimental actor in Hollywood than Johnny Depp? You might think that his consistent choice of idiosyncratic literary characters – Hunter S. Thompson, Willy Wonka, Jack Sparrow, Ichabod Crane, Don Juan, James Barrie, The Mad Hatter – amounts to self-typing, but he’s too adventurous to let any one of those resemble another. Nor does a concern about his star status seem to affect his choices. In 2010: Tonto?

Making a lot out of a little – We love it when an actor doesn’t have a starring or major role and still makes a quality impression. We would go see any movie with Don Cheadle even if he was only on screen for a matter of minutes; he brings so many smaller characters to life: overconfident ex-con Maurice Miller in Steven Soderbergh's Out of Sight (1998), naively hopeful Buck Swope in Paul Thomas Anderson's Boogie Nights (1997), unintelligible Basher Tarr in Soderbergh's remake of Oceans 11 (2001), and corrupt Haitian official Henri Moore in Brett Ratner's otherwise forgettable heist film After the Sunset (2004).

So, given these criteria, how does Kevin Spacey stack up? Well, we’re going to leave that up to you. Suffice it to say, Spacey has assembled a body of work with which one can begin to make these sort of distinctions. He began his career with small but notable turns in films like Working Girl, Henry and June, and Glengarry Glen Ross. If you take Bryan Singer's The Usual Suspects (1995) as his first great film and run your finger down the list to what you consider his most recent superior work, do you cross into a second decade? Has he begun to coast? What about variety of roles? Are his characters distinct from one another? Does he take risks?

It’s hard to judge an actor on the basis of just three films, which is what Film Club limited itself to in selecting the stand-out works of Kevin Spacey, but we’re pretty impressed with the three we chose. And we leave it up to you, as you watch Spacey morph into 1950s and ‘60s singer and teen idol Bobby Darin in this musical biopic, to place Spacey in that pantheon of current great male actors. One more question: Does Spacey’s decision to use his own singing voice, as Joaquin Phoenix did in James Mangold's Walk the Line, move him up or down your list?

R. Findlay
Film Club Adviser

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Sam Mendes' American Beauty (1999)


Program currently a.w.o.l. Please check back later.

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Bryan Singer’s The Usual Suspects (1995)


The Usual Suspects (1995) stands out as an incredible film for so many reasons, but these reasons all revolve around the many talented actors assembled – Stephen Baldwin, Kevin Pollack, Chazz Palminteri, Gabriel Byrne, Benicio Del Toro, and especially Kevin Spacey as “the Gimp,” Roger “Verbal” Kint. As is so often true with character-based films, quality acting creates lasting memories.

Spacey goes all out here. He aggressively prepared for his Kint role, filing his shoes down to create the kind of wear they would get if he actually had a limp and gluing his fingers together to simulate the effects of a disability. And this kind of attention to detail paid off. Even though he’d been acting in movies for almost a decade when he took the role in The Usual Suspects, his turn as Kint solidified our appreciation of his talent and opened more leading roles up to him in films like American Beauty, K-Pax, Shipping News, and Beyond the Sea.

The Usual Suspects also benefits from great writing. Christopher McQuarrie’s script, highlighted by Spacey’s voice-over narration and the witty dialogue between Palminteri’s Kujan and Spacey’s Kint, reflects and enhances the masterful balance and layering of the film.

Beyond the writing, Bryan Singer’s ability to create a masterpiece out of “the concept of a movie poster of five guys in a lineup” never ceases to amaze. This movie is one of those that gets better on repeat viewings, even if you know the film’s surprise ending. The movie accomplishes the feat of bringing together so many different stories, people and effects and flows them concisely together through entertaining twists and turns that so much detail, so many tiny clues and hints to the film’s subtext, evades the viewer’s eye that only multiple viewings can detect.

Singer’s genius lies in his ability to not only do the best job directing possible (and by the end of the film you’ll notice that he’s not only an expert at visual misdirection, but also a master at wrapping you up in the story), but to have the flexibility to allow actors to build complex, entertaining characters, like Benicio Del Toro’s quick, unintelligible Fenster. These things combined – the breathtaking tension of the film, the smooth, cool hilariousness of characters like Fenster, McManus and the assortment of ‘usual suspects’ – pushes the movie beyond a sharp mystery to a truly unique work of art.

And this is a mystery: The American Film Institute has listed The Usual Suspects as one of the top ten mysteries. What mystery does this film address, what questions does it ask? Here’s a challenge, what questions did the movie ask of you and what fears do the possible answers give you?

Daniel Preus
Film Club Co-President